|
Getting
On The Bung
Sean Fagan of RL1908.com

This article was first published in Inside
Sport (April 2008).
|
You
don’t have to go far to find someone that reckons
Australia’s footballers are overpaid slackers.
It’s a common enough cry; heard every time yet
another footballer is brought into the public
glare for his alleged distasteful behaviour.
A
decade after the dawn of truly full-time professional
era, where footballers no longer have a job, all
our football codes are still struggling to rein
in the off-field antics of some of their players.
Despite
the daily sooth-saying skills of our media commentators,
none were seemingly adept enough in the mid-1990s
to recognize what was ahead and warn us.
If
only we had some inkling, our football administrators
could have avoided some truly horrendous days,
our children would never had been exposed to some
awful realities about their football heroes.
The tragedy is we were warned, but the advice
was delivered way to early, coming a century ago
with the birth of rugby league – Australia’s first
professional football code.
The
league’s formation was centred upon the staunch
refusal of the NSWRU and QRU to breakaway from
England’s RFU – a body whose overriding principle
was that of the “gentleman amateur”, where
rugby should be played merely for its enjoyment,
and not financial gain.
The
most any footballer could expect to be paid was
a 3 shillings-per-day travelling allowance when
away from home. While the 3s limit was of practically
no consequence to “the silver-spoon fed sons
of the nobility” in England, the majority
of Australia’s rugby footballers were tradesmen,
labourers and miners.
Footballers
were forced to draw on their own savings (if they
had any) to go on a tour, even though they were
representing their state or Australia.
The
3s also did nothing to look after footballers’
families while they were on tour, or, most disconcertingly,
if they were injured and unable to work. Some,
feigning injury or work commitments, dropped out
of representative teams rather than admit to not
having enough money.
With
rugby riding a wave of popularity in the early
1900s, Australia’s rugby union bodies began to
accumulate vast sums of money from the gate-takings
at inter-state and Australian matches.
Unsurprisingly,
players increasingly felt that it was unfair that
they were out-of-pocket and putting their family’s
financial security at risk.
Australia’s
rugby union bosses refused to go beyond the 3s
allowance – while to do so would automatically
breach the RFU’s laws against professionalism,
there was also a seriously held belief that NSW
and Queensland rugby players would simply “get
on the bung” (booze) with the extra money.
In
effect, the 3s limit was a means to control the
standard of behaviour of the team while away inter-state
or overseas.
The
principle may well have been sound. In 1898, when
a mere four regional teams from country NSW visited
Sydney for a week, the NSWRU was left with a hotel
bill for an astounding 626 drinks.
Almost
every time the 3s allowance was criticised by
the players, drinking rated a mention. Many NSW
Waratahs players pointed out that while in Brisbane
they had paid away their 3s in just one pub shout,
adding “A man could not take a drink – if they
were worthy of the name of ‘men’ – without reciprocating.”
Newtown’s
Harry Hammill, a front rower in the Waratahs team
of 1906, complained to anyone that would listen:
“I’ve been here almost a fortnight on this
three-bob-a-day racket, and, after a couple of
rum-and-milks in the morning, I’m broke!”
The
disquiet amongst the players turned into a full
revolt, and in 1908 professional rugby league
teams formed in Sydney, Brisbane and Newcastle.
The
league announced that players would be given an
allowance of 8s, medical insurance, free medicine
and doctor’s visits. Gate-takings from club matches
were also to be divided up amongst the footballers,
representative players would be given match payments,
and those fortunate enough to go on a Kangaroo
tour to England would each get an even share of
the profits (expected to be in the hundreds of
pounds per man).
No
team sport in Australia had ever been so brazen
as to openly pay its players.
While
the footballers saw themselves as getting a fair
reward from their labour, anyone signing with
rugby league (denounced as “the professional
viper”) risked being publicly scorned as a
“professional” or “mercenary”.
Rugby
league, it seemed, was opening the door to an
era where a footballer could earn his entire living
from his sport.
While
this had not been much of an issue for the community
with individual “professionals” in boxing
and rowing, the sudden thought of dozens of young
men living the high-life off their football money
startled many.
“It
is obviously undesirable that any large number
of young men should devote themselves to sport
as a means of getting a livelihood,” was one
of many concerned newspaper editorials. “Footballers
get paid a large sum of money – for what?”
asked another. “For playing an hour and half
per week of their favourite game. The professional
footballer simply has to keep himself trim for
one football match per week.”
Public
order was evidently at stake. The air was full
of an apparent looming terror that if rugby league
became established, professional footballers would
soon be running amok, and “their idleness and
easy money would inevitably lead to temptation,
decadency and ultimately their demise”.
No
doubt it would soon encourage younger men to emulate
their “football heroes”, and they too would
choose a football career over a responsible trade
or vocation.
At
a Manly rugby union club meeting wild applause
erupted following the pronouncement by one man
that “he would rather see his son dead at his
feet than have him playing professional football.”
There
was also concern that “cash-chasing footballers”
would only be “out for gold, not glory”,
and thus could not be trusted on the field.
The
Sydney Morning Herald, horrified at the mere
thought of professional football, found it inconceivable
that the Australian public would ever embrace
it: “We can cannot believe that in this country
the performances of men hired for the occasion
will ever rival our local (amateur) football for
public interest.”
Newspaper
editors argued that any young man who devoted
his 20s – his most productive years – to playing
football, instead of learning and improving his
trade, was failing to fit himself for the rest
of his working life.
They
pointed out that other younger players would soon
arise, and their football career would be over
as quickly as it had begun. “Their proficiency
soon comes to an end,” explained one newspaper.
“The players of this year will be outshone
by the players of a year hence, and if they have
no other resource their fate will be almost as
pitiable as that of the discarded politician.”
The
reality was that no footballer, not even Dally
Messenger, could live off his football earnings
unless he signed with an English club.
The
warnings were sound, but they were 90 years too
early.
Footballers
and alcohol continued to be linked throughout
the century, but it largely remained out of the
newspapers. By the end of the winter of 1910,
rugby league had usurped rugby union as the preferred
football code in NSW and Queensland.
With
professional football up and running north of
the Murray, the VFL followed in 1911. Remaining
on the outside were the amateur footballers of
rugby union.
The
captain of the 1908 Wallabies, Herbert “Paddy’
Moran, astutely observed that footballers will
always remain “public figures” and that
“it would seem a good suggestion for a list
of the minimum requirements to be drawn up”
for the players concerning their off-field standards.
When
speaking of critics of footballers though, Moran
thought that many “minor evils” in footballers
should be overlooked.
He
argued that football is meant to “be vigorous
and a little dangerous”, and the men who play
it are not all perfect. “When
men have a difference, let us settle it quickly
and get on with the game” he said.
It
would seem the media commentators of the mid-1990s
didn’t foresee the problems full-time professionalism
would bring because they themselves hadn’t yet
established a new benchmark of acceptable behaviour.
Moran,
in words that no doubt would find support amongst
today’s footballers, said “We are judged by
severer standards than they use for themselves.”
“Above
all,” he added, “let us beware newspaper
sleuths, who expand misdemeanours into serious
crimes in order to satisfy the vicious appetites
which they themselves have created.”
This
article was first published in Inside
Sport (April 2008).
|